Commercial Services:
Search the Entire Commercial MLS | View
Harbor City's Commercial Listings | 1031
Exchange Guide
Investor Learning Center | Commercial
Corridor Guide | Buyer/Tenant Services
| Seller Services
Investor Assistance Questionnaire
| HARBOR
CITY INVESTOR LEARNING CENTER |
 |
MESSAGE FROM BROKER/TOC
A. MEASURING AND COMPARING
INVESTMENTS
B. REAL ESTATE FINANCE
C. PURCHASE AND SALE ISSUES
D. LEASE LINGO AND LEASE NEGOTIATION
ISSUES
E. REAL ESTATE TAX ISSUES
C. PURCHASE AND SALE ISSUES
1.
Aside From the Purchase Price, What Are the Most Commonly Negotiated
Issues in a Commercial Purchase Contract?
In the residential context, it is very common to
make use of standardized form contracts. This is almost never the
case with commercial purchase contracts. Instead, contract terms
vary widely in their length, scope, and favoritism toward the buyer
or seller. Commercial purchase contracts are sometimes intensely
negotiated by the parties and their respective attorneys. Below
is a summary of key issues that often are the subject of negotiation:
- Earnest Money. The
purchaser will typically try to “tie up” the property
with a relatively small deposit. Especially during strong market
conditions, a seller may demand a more substantial earnest money
deposit so as to confirm that the purchaser is serious about the
property.
- Inspection Period and Liquidated
Damages. A sophisticated purchaser will typically
attempt to limit its liability in the event that it becomes necessary
to cancel the transaction. While this practice is not customary
in residential transactions, it is very common in commercial transactions.
Thus, a commercial purchaser will almost always attempt to include
contract clauses that: (i) give the purchaser a right to receive
a refund of the earnest money in the event that the purchaser
terminates the contract during a designated “inspection
period” or “due diligence period”; (ii) confirms
the agreement of the parties that, in the event of a termination
by the purchaser after the inspection period has expired, the
earnest money deposit shall serve as “liquidated damages”,
with the purchaser having no further liability for damages.
- Length of Inspection Period. A
purchaser typically tries to negotiate a long inspection period
(perhaps 90 days, 120 days, or longer with rights to further extend
the inspection period), whereas the seller will desire to limit
the length of the inspection period (a 30 day inspection period
is considered short by commercial standards).
- Special Contingencies.
A purchaser may attempt to add a clause that conditions its obligation
to close upon the occurrence of certain events that may not be
completely within the purchaser’s control. A common example
is a special contingency that releases the purchaser from its
obligation to close in the event that a necessary rezoning application
or site plan is not approved by governmental authorities.
- Representations and Warranties.
A purchaser will attempt to get the seller to make certain affirmative
statements regarding the property. In contrast, the ideal seller
contract includes an “as is” clause whereby the purchaser
agrees that the seller has made no representations or warranties
regarding the property.
2.
What Is Meant by the Phrase “Due Diligence”? What Are
the Key Elements of an Investor’s Due Diligence Investigations
of a Potential Investment?
“Due Diligence” is a phrase that generally
refers to a party’s investigation of a property. Purchasers,
lenders and tenants all engage in various forms of due diligence.
Since we are focusing on the investor perspective, below is a summary
of key types of due diligence investigations that a purchaser might
pursue in connection with a potential investment:
- Title Review. It
is critical that an investor promptly engage an attorney to conduct
a title review as soon as possible after a property is put under
contract. The attorney will often need significant “lead
time” to coordinate the work of a title abstractor and surveyor.
The results of the title search and survey are typically summarized
in a “title commitment”, which is a commitment by
a title insurance underwriter to issue a title insurance policy
to the investor (and its lender), subject to the “exceptions”
(e.g. easements, covenants, deed restrictions) to title set forth
in the title commitment, and subject to the satisfaction of the
“requirements (e.g. termination of the seller’s existing
mortgage) set forth in the title commitment. This process is critical,
as the title search may reveal defects in title that make the
property undesirable as an investment.
- Survey. A property
survey is typically ordered in conjunction with the title search.
There are different standards for the quality of the survey and
it is important to distinguish an “ALTA” survey (required
by some lenders) from other surveys. Among other distinctions,
an ALTA survey requires that the surveyor actually review the
title exception documents listed in a title commitment and either:
(a) plot the exception on the survey; (b) indicate that the exception
does not actually apply to the property; or (c) indicate that
the exception does apply to the property but that the exception
cannot be precisely located on the survey.
- Lease Review. An
investor (or his attorney) needs to review the terms of the property’s
leases for the following purposes, among others: (a) confirm the
net operating income that the lease with generate; (b) confirm
the length of the lease term and the existence of any renewal
options; (c) confirm if the tenant has any ability to terminate
the lease early; and (d) confirm that the other legal terms of
the lease are acceptable to both the investor and the investor’s
lender.
- Tenant Estoppel Certificates.
It is customary for a purchaser to request an estoppel certificate
from each of the property’s tenants. An estoppel certificate
is an affirmative written statement by the tenant that, among
other things, confirms the key terms of the lease and confirms
that the tenant does not have any claims or offsets against the
current landlord. A lender will often require that the estoppel
certificate be addressed to the lender and that the lender’s
preferred form of estoppel certificate be used.
- Zoning. Inquiry should
be made with the city or county authorities to confirm that the
zoning of the property is consistent with the intended use. If
the zoning needs to be changed, the purchase contract should specifically
address that issue and provide a mechanism for the parties to
pursue rezoning of the property, ideally prior to closing.
- Environmental Review.
It may be appropriate to order a Phase I environmental report
to confirm that the property (or neighboring properties) are not
contaminated by hazardous substances. For smaller investments,
some investors elect not to incur this cost if they otherwise
feel confident about the environmental condition of the property
and if a Phase I report is not required by their lender. An “environmental
screen” is a environmental review that is less expensive
(and less thorough) than a Phase I report. Some lenders are willing
to accept an “environmental screen” instead of a Phase
I report for smaller investments.
- Appraisal.
Where a purchase is to be leveraged with borrowed funds, lenders
almost universally require an appraisal of the property. Since
an appraisal is a “lead time” item (some appraisers
have a backlog of a month or more to generate an appraisal), it
should be ordered as early as possible. Often, a lender will require
that the appraisal be ordered directly by the lender, using one
of their approved appraisers.
- Special Issues for New Construction.
Where land is being purchased for development, several additional
investigations become necessary. These include: (a) preparation
and government approval of plans and specifications; (b) analysis
of construction costs; (c) confirmation of the availability of
utilities; (d) soil compaction tests; and (e) confirmation of
ability to obtain building permits.
|